Timothy Steele
Born
in 1948 in
Steele has also published two widely discussed works of literary criticism, Missing Measures: Modern Poetry and the Revolt against
Meter (1990) and All the Funs in How You
Say a Thing: An Explanation of Meter and Versification (1999); and he has edited The Poems of J. V. Cunningham (1997).
Steeles honors include a Guggenheim Fellowship, a Peter I. B. Lavan Younger Poets
Award from the
Statement for Poet of the Month
Because I use meter and rhyme, critics have labeled me a formalist. But I have
never liked that term. It suggests a preoccupation with style at the expense of content,
whereas I believe that the two are equally important.
Indeed, one reason the traditional instruments of verse are valuable is that they
encourage poets to think deeply and flexibly about their subjects. The exigencies of meter
often lead us to examine our thoughts and feelings from perspectives that we might not
otherwise adopt. In seeking to harmonize expression and measure, we are unlikely to
content ourselves with the first words that occur to us, but will try out different
phrasal and clausal arrangementsperhaps eventually lighting upon a formulation that
is more interesting, comprehensive, and truer than that suggested by early impulse.
Moreover, when we are obliged to think not only reasonably but rhythmically, we give
intuition freer play than it would receive under other circumstances. And when we rhyme,
we frequently discover not only correspondences between syllables, but also illuminating
connections between concepts and images.
Overall, the devices of poetic structure aid and support memory, pleasing the ear,
nourishing the mind, and fortifying language against the corruption and triviality that
threaten it at every turn in public life and culture.
Yet as deeply as I believe in the value of metrical composition, I have never argued or
felt that vers libre is wrong or immoral or that meter is right and pure. The experimental